這篇文章並不能作為依據。 作者已指出如下的陳訴:
1,The numerical findings should not be generalized to broader sets of cases.
=================================
蠢!所有的文章都有类似的语言.
踩楼[0]顶[0]
游客IP:71.204.88.*发布于 2016-04-20 14:3616 楼#
這篇文章並不能作為依據。 作者已指出如下的陳訴:
1,The numerical findings should not be generalized to broader sets of cases.
2. The result is not real rate of wrongfully convicted cases; it is just "comparing decisions of actual jurors with decisions of judges who were hearing the cases they were deciding."
3. The method of the study is not perfect. To obtain a numerical estimate of jury accuracy, some assumptions were made,
作者:168通讯员9 时间:2016年04月10日 00:43 查看全文